[address-policy-wg] 2011-04 New Policy Proposal (Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-04 New Policy Proposal (Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-03 Proposal Accepted (Post-depletion IPv4 address recycling)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Andy Davidson
andy at nosignal.org
Mon Oct 24 18:02:22 CEST 2011
Hi there, On 24 Oct 2011, at 14:29, Remco Van Mook <Remco.vanMook at eu.equinix.com> wrote: > Organisations that meet the initial allocation criteria are eligible to > receive an initial allocation of /32. For initial allocations up to /29 no > additional documentation is necessary. > > Organisations may qualify for an initial allocation greater than /29 by > submitting documentation that reasonably justifies the request. If so, the > allocation size will be based on the number of existing users and the > extent of the organisation's infrastructure. Support the policy in general (so please implement in some similar form after discussion) but strongly support the exact methodology proposed by Remco above. Andy
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-04 New Policy Proposal (Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-03 Proposal Accepted (Post-depletion IPv4 address recycling)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]