[address-policy-wg] 2011-04 New Policy Proposal (Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-04 New Policy Proposal (Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-04 New Policy Proposal (Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Dan Luedtke
maildanrl at googlemail.com
Mon Oct 24 14:51:11 CEST 2011
Hallo, On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 2:12 PM, Michael Adams <madams at netcologne.de> wrote: > Am 24.10.2011 11:59, schrieb Dan Luedtke: >> Isn't it better to change that procedure to not require unnecessary work? > For us this would be sufficient. Something like "If you qualify for an initial > /29 you may extend your /32 directly to a /29 an skip the HD-ratio rule." would > perfectly match for us. I am not a RIPE member (just a regular customer of a LIR), so I don't know if I can propose a policy change, but I am sure you can. -- snip -- 5.2.1. Subsequent allocation criteria Subsequent allocation will be provided when an organisation (i.e. ISP/LIR): a) satisfies the evaluation threshold of past address utilisation in terms of the number of sites in units of /56 assignments. The HD-Ratio [RFC 3194] is used to determine the utilisation thresholds that justify the allocation of additional address as described below; b) qualifies in accordance with the criteria for an initial allocation of /29. -- snap -- Something like this? regards. danrl -- Dan Luedtke http://www.danrl.de
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-04 New Policy Proposal (Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-04 New Policy Proposal (Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]