[address-policy-wg] scaling # of prefixes Re: Proposal 2011-02 moving to Last Call
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 routing table stats
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] scaling # of prefixes Re: Proposal 2011-02 moving to Last Call
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Sun Oct 2 19:55:39 CEST 2011
Hi, On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 03:26:11PM +0100, Nick Hilliard wrote: > On 30/09/2011 09:28, Turchanyi Geza wrote: > > In summary: we do not have the technology which would allow a very liberal > > PI allocation policy, therefore a very liberal PI allocation policy is not > > possible now. > > > > Strict limits must be kept. > > I get the impression that people are talking about something which lies > somewhere between "very liberal" and "strict limits". Indeed, and to stress a point that Mikael has already made: even with that change, it's still not "single click" easy to get PIv6. PIv6 still needs application forms to be filled, a contract to be signed, and yearly fees to be paid - which shifts the balance somewhat away from "PIv6 is the easy way" (but if people have appropriate usage scenarios, it's still *possible* to get PIv6). Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 routing table stats
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] scaling # of prefixes Re: Proposal 2011-02 moving to Last Call
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]