[address-policy-wg] 2011-04, "Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation"
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-04, "Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation"
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-04, "Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Tim Chown
tjc at ecs.soton.ac.uk
Wed Nov 16 10:19:58 CET 2011
On 16 Nov 2011, at 09:03, Sascha Lenz <slz at baycix.de> wrote: > > Why is everyone focussing on the 6RD part? Perhaps in part due to it being the one technology that has been used to date to enable a significant IPv6 deployment (1.5m users, 18Gbit/s traffic for free.fr, reportedly). Of course 6rd should only have a limited lifetime, but it's reality now. Tim
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-04, "Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation"
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-04, "Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]