[address-policy-wg] 2011-04, "Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation"
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-04, "Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation"
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-04, "Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jan Zorz @ go6.si
jan at go6.si
Tue Nov 15 11:25:11 CET 2011
On 11/15/11 10:49 AM, Daniel Roesen wrote: > On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 08:59:35AM +0100, Jan Zorz @ go6.si wrote: >> Broadcom revealed that in new chipset for CPE IPv6 and 6RD are HW >> accelerated. Major vendors are offering 6RD core boxes and many operators >> are testing them. Let's do that properly, if it's unavoidable. 6RD is not >> the best mechanism ever invented, but making it more complicated and >> expensive with multiple-6rd-domains because of lack of IPv6 space makes >> operational life even more complicated. > > "properly" as in "easy to deploy" would be to have an extra, eventually > temporary, separate /24 for 6RD. Maybe yes (as this was also my idea initially), but we already went through this discussion and message from community was clear. Cheers, Jan
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-04, "Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation"
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-04, "Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]