[address-policy-wg] 2011-04, "Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation"
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-04, "Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation"
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-04, "Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Anfinsen, Ragnar
Ragnar.Anfinsen at altibox.no
Mon Nov 14 16:23:34 CET 2011
+1 MVH/Regards Ragnar > -----Opprinnelig melding----- > Fra: address-policy-wg-bounces at ripe.net [mailto:address-policy-wg- > bounces at ripe.net] På vegne av James Blessing > Sendt: 14. november 2011 11:13 > Til: Address Policy Working Group > Emne: [address-policy-wg] 2011-04, "Extension of the Minimum Size for > IPv6 Initial Allocation" > > Hi all, > > It seems that the consensus is that up to a /29 is the right amount of > space for the majority of networks, if that is the case I've think we > should add the following: > > == > > 5.1.x > > Organisations that have already received their initial allocations are > able to request additional address space up to a /29 without supplying > of further documentation as if they were a first time requestor. > > == > > The logic being that this solves the problem for networks who deployed > before this change and avoids the issues with HD ratio (which I think > needs some looking at, but not here) > > J > > -- > > James Blessing > 07989 039 476
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-04, "Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation"
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-04, "Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]