[address-policy-wg] Status of 2011-02 Policy Proposal Removal of multihomed requirement for IPv6)?

On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 10:28 AM, Turchanyi Geza
<turchanyi.geza at gmail.com> wrote:
> 1, Most of the content must be accessible on IPv6 stack as well;
> 2, Broadband users must be supported.
Never questioned that. But, that is no reason to stay in the way of
those who *want* to deploy IPv6 but cannot get their hands on
addresses. It is just not ok, that a RIPE policy is preventing
deployment in some networks while we are pushing large ISP to deploy
it. We should push *all* parties to deploy it. It's not only the ISPs
internet, although they are a/the force of it.

As I understood, the other RIRs have not encountered a pollution
problem when allowing PI assignments without multihome-requirement.
But I may be wrong on this, as I have no numbers were I am right now.


regards,
  Dan
-- 
Dan Luedtke
http://www.danrl.de