[address-policy-wg] Status of 2011-02 Policy Proposal (Removal of multihomed requirement for IPv6)?
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Status of 2011-02 Policy Proposal (Removal of multihomed requirement for IPv6)?
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Status of 2011-02 Policy Proposal (Removal of multihomed requirement for IPv6)?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Dan Luedtke
maildanrl at googlemail.com
Wed Nov 9 09:05:43 CET 2011
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 10:02 AM, Turchanyi Geza <turchanyi.geza at gmail.com> wrote: > nothing stops th IPv4 PI owners to use IPv6 PA.... - except that one has to renumber the whole network when finally (if ever) receiving PIv6 - which leads to about double costs In fact, I have a mixed network (PIv4, PAv6) at the moment, but I am still wondering why I cannot get assigned PIv6. What changed? regards, Dan -- Dan Luedtke http://www.danrl.de
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Status of 2011-02 Policy Proposal (Removal of multihomed requirement for IPv6)?
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Status of 2011-02 Policy Proposal (Removal of multihomed requirement for IPv6)?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]