[address-policy-wg] Status of 2011-02 Policy Proposal Removal of multihomed requirement for IPv6)?

> >> I tell you, widespread PI adoption is poison for the network.
> > Maybe, maybe not.
> 
> No, really, it is. 

This policy has been discussed in detail in the past 6 months and we keep
circling back on the same topics. 

And sorry to burst your bubble, but you are wrong and the information (read
as: the facts and not as gut feelings) from the other RIR's show (from those
that have a similar policy in place) that the number of v6 PI prefixes is
not taking the steep jump. 

The policy has come to the end of the last call and in the RIPE minutes on
Wednesday it was specified that : 

"The APWG co-Chairs announced their intention to declare consensus on
proposal 2011-02, "Removal of multihomed requirement for IPv6 PI". " 

Having said this, this policy will help us all in the so much required v6
adoption across the board and it is still possible to propose a change in
the v6 PI policy if the take-up is moving out of hand. 

On the other hand, this discussion will probably be revisited or become
unneeded if and when PI and PA are all going to be treated as equal in the
future.   

Regards,
Erik Bais