[address-policy-wg] Status of 2011-02 Policy Proposal (Removal of multihomed requirement for IPv6)?
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Status of 2011-02 Policy Proposal (Removal of multihomed requirement for IPv6)?
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Status of 2011-02 Policy Proposal (Removal of multihomed requirement for IPv6)?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Turchanyi Geza
turchanyi.geza at gmail.com
Mon Nov 7 10:02:43 CET 2011
Hi Dan, nothing stops th IPv4 PI owners to use IPv6 PA.... Good luck, Géza On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 12:30 PM, Dan Luedtke <maildanrl at googlemail.com>wrote: > > Nudge received :-) We are still going through the whole mailing list > archive to see which concerns were raised and how they were addressed. > Quite a lot of messages were sent about this proposal over the last months! > We're working on it. > > Good to hear that. I (as many other IPv4 PI "owners") can't wait to > geht my IPv6 PI. > > regards, > > Dan > > -- > danrl / Dan Luedtke > http://www.danrl.de > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20111107/546c9c8a/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Status of 2011-02 Policy Proposal (Removal of multihomed requirement for IPv6)?
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Status of 2011-02 Policy Proposal (Removal of multihomed requirement for IPv6)?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]