[address-policy-wg] 6rd as technology that might have an impact to HD ratio

Hi,

During last week the question was risen "what do we do, if we get /29, 
assign /30 for 6rd, use /30 for native part of deployment, then we fill 
it up and need additional allocation? Is 6RD /30 assignment valid as a 
whole in HD ratio game?"

Well, my thoughts on this are:

1. If you filled up the whole /30, then you should probably not be 
running 6RD anymore, get rid of it and use that space for native
2. If you filled up /30 and can't get rid of 6RD, evaluate again you 
addressing plan sanity :)
3. If nothing of the above does apply, you are probably so big you 
should get more than /29 as initial allocation anyway
4. What else can possibly go wrong?

So, 6RD should not be treated as anything special, as it is not a part 
of modified text in the policy, therefore if you are running 6RD, you 
still need to show the number of sites that you are covering with IPv6 
PD and this has really nothing to do with 2011-04 proposal (but I can 
see new HD ratio discussion in the horizon :) )

I was specifically asked to put this question forward on this 
mailinglist in order to provide some further guidance for IPRAs, if 
2011-04 reaches consensus (hope so :) )

Cheers, Jan