[address-policy-wg] HD-ratio (was: 2011-04 New Policy Proposal (Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation))

On 05-11-11 12:16, "Gert Doering" <gert at space.net> wrote:

>
>I think I mentioned this a few times before: if you think the HD ratio
>is using the wrong number, or if you think the HD formula is completely
>wrong to start with, please submit a policy proposal to change this to
>whatever you think would work better.
>
>But this is somewhat out of scope for the discussion of 2011-04 and
>should not be discussed in *this* thread.
>
+1 from my side as well. In addition, I consider it rather a feature of
the current HD-ratio that using transition technologies such as 6RD can
get you in trouble for subsequent allocations if you don't clean up at
some point. 

Best,

Remco




This email is from Equinix Europe Limited or one of its associated/subsidiary companies. This email, and any files transmitted with it, contains information which is confidential, may be legally privileged and is solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this email immediately.  Equinix Europe Limited.  Registered Office: Quadrant House, 4 Thomas More Square, London E1W 1YW.  Registered in England and Wales, No. 6293383.