[address-policy-wg] 2011-03 New Policy Proposal (Post-depletion IPv4 address recycling)

On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 2:47 PM, Daniel Suchy <danny at danysek.cz> wrote:
<snip>

>
> Reserve in last /8 is quite enough to cover future requirements for very
> long term and there's no need to block address usage in other /8 managed
> by RIPE NCC. Your proposal simply creates additional blocked and
> efectivelly unused address space in other /8 just due to the policy.
> RIPE NCC is here for address distribution to end users. I'm just using
> arguments of Remco now - addresses should be used, not reserved for
> something surreal.

I think you might missed the same fine point I did... RIPE NCC can still
return addresses to IANA and those addresses will not fall in under the /8
rule?


-- 

Roger Jorgensen           |
rogerj at gmail.com          | - IPv6 is The Key!
http://www.jorgensen.no   | roger at jorgensen.no