[address-policy-wg] 2011-03 New Policy Proposal (Post-depletion IPv4 address recycling)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-03 New Policy Proposal (Post-depletion IPv4 address recycling)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-03 New Policy Proposal (Post-depletion IPv4 address recycling)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Roger Jørgensen
rogerj at gmail.com
Mon May 23 08:23:02 CEST 2011
On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 10:25 PM, Remco Van Mook <Remco.vanMook at eu.equinix.com> wrote: > Hi Roger, > > The decision to give returned address space back to IANA is outside the > scope of (this?) allocation policy. The text in this policy however > explicitly leaves room for space to be returned to IANA, instead of just > stating that any and all returned space MUST be placed into the "final /8 > pool", which would have been a valid interpretation had the phrase you > quote below not been present - that would block all options to return > space to IANA, which would be bad to have in policy. > > Hence the 'the below is only valid for space we already decided is not > going back to IANA'. When I now re-reading the text again in the right context I see it. But if I'm the only one that missunderstood it I guess it's okay. -- Roger Jorgensen | rogerj at gmail.com | - IPv6 is The Key! http://www.jorgensen.no | roger at jorgensen.no
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-03 New Policy Proposal (Post-depletion IPv4 address recycling)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-03 New Policy Proposal (Post-depletion IPv4 address recycling)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]