[address-policy-wg] Legal counsel on 2008-08 (Initial Certification Policy in the RIPE NCC Service Region)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Legal counsel on 2008-08 (Initial Certification Policy in the RIPE NCC Service Region)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Legal counsel on 2008-08 (Initial Certification Policy in the RIPE NCC Service Region)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sascha Luck
lists-ripe at c4inet.net
Mon May 9 22:06:47 CEST 2011
On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 10:01:14PM +0200, Sander Steffann wrote: >I fully agree. Mind you, they could just as well just make a law that says >"You may not route any packets to/from addresses that appear on list X" and we >would have exactly the situation everyone seems to be afraid of, and it doesn't >need RPKI. As soon as laws don't allow 'your network, your rules' anymore then >anything can happen... But that is something that we'll have to steer through >voting, not address policy :) > >- Sander > Right now, this does *not* work effectively because the internet routes around such censorship attempts and there is no LEA that can reach *everyone* in the world. This policy proposal changes that. rgds, Sascha Luck
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Legal counsel on 2008-08 (Initial Certification Policy in the RIPE NCC Service Region)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Legal counsel on 2008-08 (Initial Certification Policy in the RIPE NCC Service Region)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]