[address-policy-wg] Removal of multihomed requirement for IPv6

On Sat, 7 May 2011, Alex Le Heux wrote:

> In the BGP routing table the de-aggregation levels are much higher for 
> PA allocations than for PI assignments though, 1:3.8 for PA allocations 
> and 1:1.1 for PI assignments. This is the 21% number that Gert quotes.

Ok.

So the expectation from these numbers is that since v4 PI doesn't require 
multihoming, removing this from the v6 PI requirement wouldn't really mean 
that more people getting v6 PI than are currently doing v4 PI?

Is there anything else that might be different with v6 PI without 
multihoming compared to v4 PI that means current and historic v4 PI 
numbers might not be indicative of future v6 PI behaviour?

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike at swm.pp.se