[address-policy-wg] Removal of multihomed requirement for IPv6
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Removal of multihomed requirement for IPv6
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Removal of multihomed requirement for IPv6
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Randy Bush
randy at psg.com
Fri May 6 22:49:30 CEST 2011
>> Why do you think: "50 EUR PI with no technical requirements for >> multihoming or other is a recipe for longterm disaster in my book." ? >> 50 Eur works today for IPv4 PI space as well. > > As far as I know there is still multihoming requirement for IPv4 PI. > > And if you have read my other email, I am extremely sceptical about > the global routing system being able to handle the hundreds of > thousands of PI blocks I believe we're going to see if this policy > changes. > > We need other means for people to easily change addresses and > multihome, shoving this into the global routing system is not the > right longterm solution. i am extremely wary of people changing addresses and multi-homing. what if, while they were changing addresses, a gang of hooligans stole the addresses just as they were changing them? or, if while they were multi-homing, a dutch court reposessed one of the homes? while this would not be a traditional home, being a new kind of home, the courts would have great latitude in its action. randy
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Removal of multihomed requirement for IPv6
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Removal of multihomed requirement for IPv6
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]