[address-policy-wg] 2008-08 (Initial Certification Policy in the RIPE NCC Service Region) going to Last Call
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-08 (Initial Certification Policy in the RIPE NCC Service Region) going to Last Call
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-08 (Initial Certification Policy in the RIPE NCC Service Region) going to Last Call
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Randy Bush
randy at psg.com
Thu May 5 08:50:54 CEST 2011
>>> If the community (as evidenced by this WG) tells the RIPE NCC not to >>> implement this (or more precisely to withdraw the service they are >>> already offering) then we simply open the way for private >>> certification companies in the RIPE region. >> >> in which case, i would prefer to arrange a pro-bono one. > >> So would I. But I can imagine going to my boss and saying "there are two >> alternatives for securing my address space: a pro-bono, best effort >> thing run by Randy or a professional one run on a commercial basis by >> Mega-Certicates Plc. Which would you like me to use? > > And why would that be better than having a not-for-profit org like > RIPE NCC that we are all a part of as a member, already doing this ? no one said otherwise. more careful reading would notice >>> If the community (as evidenced by this WG) tells the RIPE NCC not to >>> implement this (or more precisely to withdraw the service they are >>> already offering) then we simply open the way for private >>> certification companies in the RIPE region. randy
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-08 (Initial Certification Policy in the RIPE NCC Service Region) going to Last Call
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-08 (Initial Certification Policy in the RIPE NCC Service Region) going to Last Call
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]