[address-policy-wg] getting second IPv6 PA as a LIR
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] getting second IPv6 PA as a LIR
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] getting second IPv6 PA as a LIR
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mikael Abrahamsson
swmike at swm.pp.se
Tue May 3 13:21:56 CEST 2011
On Tue, 3 May 2011, Daniel Suchy wrote: > This doesn't making sense at all. Or then each (!!) PA assigment also > must cost 2000EUR (or more, depending on assigment size, as PA > assignments are generally larger than PI assignments). Well, you're already getting charged for the LIR cost, I don't have a problem giving discount for LIR+PA costing the same as PA. > If you only increase cost of PI, "smart people" just starts using their > PA block divided into several parts... As mentioned by Marcin Kuczera > today, this is happening ALREADY... just look into your BGP table, his > scenario isn't fiction (just is hapening on their 1st IPv6 PA)... Well, then I guess we'll just have to make sure we filter at RIR allocation size. If people announce /36 from /32 PA space, we won't accept their routes. -- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike at swm.pp.se
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] getting second IPv6 PA as a LIR
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] getting second IPv6 PA as a LIR
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]