[address-policy-wg] IPv6 PI request is turned down for my multihomed hosting facility - Why?
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 PI request is turned down for my multihomed hosting facility - Why?
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 PI request is turned down for my multihomed hosting facility - Why?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Adrian Czapek
adriano at rybnet.pl
Wed Mar 30 11:08:02 CEST 2011
W dniu 2011-03-30 10:58, Tero Toikkanen pisze: > Hi, > > As far as I’m concerned, there seems to be a strange discrepancy between > IPv4 PI and IPv6 PI. Apparently Janne has already successfully obtained > IPv4 PI and has now requested IPv6 PI, declaring the same intended use. > Could someone please point out where in the policy documents it says one > can use IPv4 PI for hosting, but not IPv6 PI? I’m having a hard time > finding such terms. > http://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/ripe-512#_8._IPv6_Provider Most important is the last sentence: The PI assignment cannot be further assigned to other organisations. And according to IPRA, if you provide hosting services on your own infratructure to other companies, you are sub-allocating part of your PI address space to them, so you cannot use PI address space for that purpose. Regards -- Adrian
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 PI request is turned down for my multihomed hosting facility - Why?
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 PI request is turned down for my multihomed hosting facility - Why?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]