[address-policy-wg] IPv6 allocations for 6RD
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 allocations for 6RD
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 allocations for 6RD
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Rémi Després
remi.despres at free.fr
Thu Mar 10 19:01:56 CET 2011
Le 28 févr. 2011 à 10:29, Randy Bush a écrit : >> I strongly support the idea of assigning a smaller prefix to ISPs >> which are in a state of deploying IPv6 but need to use transitional >> mechanism for (some of) their customers. > > only problem is that 6rd is not a transition mechanism. it is an > anti-transition mechanism. Whatever you call it, it remains an effective way to rapidly offer native IPv6 addresses, and real IPv6 service, to customers. RD
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 allocations for 6RD
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 allocations for 6RD
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]