This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] IPv6 allocations for 6RD
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 allocations for 6RD
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 allocations for 6RD
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Rémi Després
remi.despres at free.fr
Thu Mar 10 19:01:56 CET 2011
Le 28 févr. 2011 à 10:29, Randy Bush a écrit : >> I strongly support the idea of assigning a smaller prefix to ISPs >> which are in a state of deploying IPv6 but need to use transitional >> mechanism for (some of) their customers. > > only problem is that 6rd is not a transition mechanism. it is an > anti-transition mechanism. Whatever you call it, it remains an effective way to rapidly offer native IPv6 addresses, and real IPv6 service, to customers. RD
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 allocations for 6RD
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 allocations for 6RD
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]