[address-policy-wg] Board position on 2011-02
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Board position on 2011-02
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Board position on 2011-02
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Turchanyi Geza
turchanyi.geza at gmail.com
Thu Jun 30 08:43:34 CEST 2011
Hello Jim, Your comments are 100% valid, however one of your conclusion might be misleading. James, the NCC Board does not make policy. For address management > policy-making, it's this WG which does that. [The name of the WG is a big > hint... :-)] I hoped everyone knew that. The Board's job is to oversee the > NCC on behalf of its members but not get involved in operational matters. > Besides, by the time a policy proposal gets in front of the Board (impact > assessment, etc), the PDP is in the end-game and the proposal is pretty much > the settled will of the RIPE community. > This is 100% valid. > > In this case, the Board seems to be saying it doesn't think the proposed > solution is ideal but will go along with what the RIPE community decides. What else the Board could do? > I'm sure that if the Board felt that decision was not in the best interests > of the NCC, they wouldn't keep quiet about the matter. > ??? Best, Géza -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20110630/154d7693/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Board position on 2011-02
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Board position on 2011-02
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]