[address-policy-wg] Legal counsel on 2008-08 (Initial Certification Policy in the RIPE NCC Service Region)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Legal counsel on 2008-08 (Initial Certification Policy in the RIPE NCC Service Region)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Legal counsel on 2008-08 (Initial Certification Policy in the RIPE NCC Service Region)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sascha Luck
lists-ripe at c4inet.net
Wed Jun 1 23:21:40 CEST 2011
On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 11:04:05PM +0200, Sander Steffann wrote: > It will take some time (it can be done in about 10 weeks) to do > this should the need ever occur, but as this is a last-resort exit > strategy I think this is acceptable. Is this an acceptable solution > for everybody? the absolute minimum I would accept is a sunset clause (ie the policy will run to a fixed date (say 2 years away) and will not be in force unless explicitly prorogued thereafter) > And I would really like to get a solution for this problem, because > I am much more afraid of IPv4 address space hijacks once the NCC > IPv4 pool runs out... In my book that is an argument against it. Anything that prolongs the IPv4 pain, especially at the cost of having a censorship infrastructure imposed on *all* internet routing (not just v4) can't be good... rgds, s.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Legal counsel on 2008-08 (Initial Certification Policy in the RIPE NCC Service Region)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Legal counsel on 2008-08 (Initial Certification Policy in the RIPE NCC Service Region)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]