[address-policy-wg] Re: Re: 2008-08 Policy Proposal Withdrawn (Initial Certification Policy in the RIPE NCC Service Region)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] the post-mortem on 2008-08
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The PDP and consensus
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Daniel Roesen
dr at cluenet.de
Wed Jul 27 23:53:19 CEST 2011
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 12:24:10PM +0100, Nigel Titley wrote: >> The PDP worked fine, it just didn't have the outcome you desired. > The PDP did not "work fine". There is a strong demand for certification, > there is an equally strong objection. If the PDP "worked fine" we would > have hammered out a middle ground like we usually do on technical matters. How could that look like? Something like "somewhat pregnant"? My imagination fails how to find middle ground on something that seems to be fundamentally incompatible goals. But I'm biased and probably too narror-minded. Best regards, Daniel -- CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: dr at cluenet.de -- dr at IRCnet -- PGP: 0xA85C8AA0
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] the post-mortem on 2008-08
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The PDP and consensus
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]