[address-policy-wg] 2011-02 Removal of multihomed requirement for IPv6 PI

On 1 July 2011 17:14, Dan Luedtke <danrl.mailinglists at googlemail.com> wrote:
> Dear Community,
> I can't wait for this change to happen. As I discussed at IPv6 Kongress in
> Frankfurt, Germany, there are more than a handful of people wanting that
> change. For example, I have an IPv4 PI network and adopted early to IPv6
> using an IPv6 PA network.

Okay, that sounds like you have a real reason for the change, can you
please explain why (other than end users think they want/need it) ?

> Never did, nor will I ever understand why
> multihoming is required for an IPv6 PI network but not for an IPv4 PI
> network.

Given the choice I would quite willingly write a proposal IPv4 PI
requires multihoming but that would be a return to deckchair
arranging...

J

-- 

James Blessing
07989 039 476