From shane at time-travellers.org Thu Jan 6 14:20:25 2011 From: shane at time-travellers.org (Shane Kerr) Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2011 14:20:25 +0100 Subject: [address-policy-wg] 2010-06 is going to Last Call Message-ID: <1294320025.2691.1723.camel@shane-asus-laptop> Hello, [ Courtesy copy sent to address policy and database working groups. Please follow up on the ipv6-wg list. ] The Review Phase for the RIPE policy proposal 2010-06 ended on 2010-12-27 (Monday, 27 December 2010). You can see the policy proposal here: http://ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2010-06.html There were some clarifications during the Review Phase, but nothing indicating changes needed. David and I have decided that the proposal is ready for a Last Call. (As co-author of the proposal, Marco has recused himself from any consensus judgments.) The last call period is four weeks, so will end 2010-02-03 (Thursday, 3 February 2011). Please e-mail any final comments to ipv6-wg at ripe.net before then. Thanks, -- Shane From ingrid at ripe.net Thu Jan 6 13:28:04 2011 From: ingrid at ripe.net (Ingrid Wijte) Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2011 13:28:04 +0100 Subject: [address-policy-wg] New AS Number Blocks allocated to the RIPE NCC Message-ID: <4D25B554.5060107@ripe.net> Dear Colleagues, The RIPE NCC received the following AS Number Blocks from the IANA in January 2011. 56320-57343 57344-58367 197632-198655 You may want to update your records accordingly. Best regards, Ingrid Wijte Registration Services Assistant Manager RIPE NCC From kpn-ip-office at kpn.com Fri Jan 7 11:54:57 2011 From: kpn-ip-office at kpn.com (kpn-ip-office at kpn.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2011 11:54:57 +0100 Subject: [address-policy-wg] 2010-06 is going to Last Call In-Reply-To: <1294320025.2691.1723.camel@shane-asus-laptop> References: <1294320025.2691.1723.camel@shane-asus-laptop> Message-ID: I support the proposal. With kind regards, ir. A.W. (Andries) Hettema KPN OZM KS&O B&I Internet +31 70 34 38290 andries.hettema at kpn.com -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: address-policy-wg-admin at ripe.net [mailto:address-policy-wg-admin at ripe.net] Namens Shane Kerr Verzonden: donderdag 6 januari 2011 14:20 Aan: db-wg at ripe.net; 'address-policy-wg at ripe.net' Onderwerp: [address-policy-wg] 2010-06 is going to Last Call Hello, [ Courtesy copy sent to address policy and database working groups. Please follow up on the ipv6-wg list. ] The Review Phase for the RIPE policy proposal 2010-06 ended on 2010-12-27 (Monday, 27 December 2010). You can see the policy proposal here: http://ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2010-06.html There were some clarifications during the Review Phase, but nothing indicating changes needed. David and I have decided that the proposal is ready for a Last Call. (As co-author of the proposal, Marco has recused himself from any consensus judgments.) The last call period is four weeks, so will end 2010-02-03 (Thursday, 3 February 2011). Please e-mail any final comments to ipv6-wg at ripe.net before then. Thanks, -- Shane From emadaio at ripe.net Wed Jan 19 16:15:24 2011 From: emadaio at ripe.net (Emilio Madaio) Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 16:15:24 +0100 Subject: [address-policy-wg] 2010-02 Proposal Accepted (Allocations from the last /8) Message-ID: <20110119153339.7DDEF6A00A@postboy.ripe.net> Dear Colleagues, Consensus has been reached, and the proposal for a change to RIPE Document ripe-498, "IPv4 Address Allocation and Assignment Policies for the RIPE NCC Service Region", has been accepted by the RIPE community. You can find the full proposal at: http://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2010-02.html The updated RIPE Document is ripe-509 and is available at: http://ripe.net/ripe/docs/ripe-509.html Thank you for your input. Regards Emilio Madaio Policy Development Officer RIPE NCC From david.kessens at nsn.com Wed Jan 26 06:40:54 2011 From: david.kessens at nsn.com (David Kessens) Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 21:40:54 -0800 Subject: [address-policy-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg] 2010-06 is going to Last Call In-Reply-To: <1294320025.2691.1723.camel@shane-asus-laptop> References: <1294320025.2691.1723.camel@shane-asus-laptop> Message-ID: <20110126054054.GA27563@nsn.com> [ Courtesy copy sent to address policy and database working groups. Please follow up on the ipv6-wg list. ] All, We have not received any input so far whether you support draft policy 2010-06. While silence will in general be interpreted as consensus, we prefer to have a good number of statements of support as that will make it unequivocally clear that consensus was indeed reached. The last call period will end 2010-02-03 (Thursday, 3 February 2011). Please e-mail any final comments to ipv6-wg at ripe.net before then. Thanks, David & Shane --- On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 02:20:25PM +0100, Shane Kerr wrote: > Hello, > > [ Courtesy copy sent to address policy and database working groups. Please > follow up on the ipv6-wg list. ] > > The Review Phase for the RIPE policy proposal 2010-06 ended on > 2010-12-27 (Monday, 27 December 2010). > > You can see the policy proposal here: > > http://ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2010-06.html > > There were some clarifications during the Review Phase, but nothing > indicating changes needed. > > David and I have decided that the proposal is ready for a Last Call. (As > co-author of the proposal, Marco has recused himself from any consensus > judgments.) > > The last call period is four weeks, so will end 2010-02-03 (Thursday, 3 > February 2011). Please e-mail any final comments to ipv6-wg at ripe.net > before then. > > Thanks, > > -- > Shane From marty at akamai.com Wed Jan 26 15:07:31 2011 From: marty at akamai.com (Hannigan, Martin) Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 09:07:31 -0500 Subject: [address-policy-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg] 2010-06 is going to Last Call In-Reply-To: <20110126054054.GA27563@nsn.com> Message-ID: On 1/26/11 12:40 AM, "David Kessens" wrote: > We have not received any input so far whether you support draft policy > 2010-06. While silence will in general be interpreted as consensus, we > prefer to have a good number of statements of support as that will make it > unequivocally clear that consensus was indeed reached. > I support this proposal. Best, -M< From cgrundemann at gmail.com Wed Jan 26 16:03:07 2011 From: cgrundemann at gmail.com (Chris Grundemann) Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 08:03:07 -0700 Subject: [address-policy-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg] 2010-06 is going to Last Call In-Reply-To: <20110126054054.GA27563@nsn.com> References: <1294320025.2691.1723.camel@shane-asus-laptop> <20110126054054.GA27563@nsn.com> Message-ID: On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 22:40, David Kessens wrote: > > [ Courtesy copy sent to address policy and database working groups. Please > ?follow up on the ipv6-wg list. ] > > All, > > We have not received any input so far whether you support draft policy > 2010-06. While silence will in general be interpreted as consensus, we > prefer to have a good number of statements of support as that will make it > unequivocally clear that consensus was indeed reached. I support this policy. ~Chris > The last call period will end 2010-02-03 (Thursday, 3 February 2011). Please > e-mail any final comments to ipv6-wg at ripe.net before then. > > Thanks, > > David & Shane > --- > > On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 02:20:25PM +0100, Shane Kerr wrote: >> Hello, >> >> [ Courtesy copy sent to address policy and database working groups. Please >> ? follow up on the ipv6-wg list. ] >> >> The Review Phase for the RIPE policy proposal 2010-06 ended on >> 2010-12-27 (Monday, 27 December 2010). >> >> You can see the policy proposal here: >> >> http://ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2010-06.html >> >> There were some clarifications during the Review Phase, but nothing >> indicating changes needed. >> >> David and I have decided that the proposal is ready for a Last Call. (As >> co-author of the proposal, Marco has recused himself from any consensus >> judgments.) >> >> The last call period is four weeks, so will end 2010-02-03 (Thursday, 3 >> February 2011). Please e-mail any final comments to ipv6-wg at ripe.net >> before then. >> >> Thanks, >> >> -- >> Shane > > -- @ChrisGrundemann weblog.chrisgrundemann.com www.burningwiththebush.com www.theIPv6experts.net www.coisoc.org From ale at ipvision.dk Wed Jan 26 15:41:45 2011 From: ale at ipvision.dk (Allan Eising) Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 15:41:45 +0100 Subject: [address-policy-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg] 2010-06 is going to Last Call In-Reply-To: <20110126054054.GA27563@nsn.com> References: <1294320025.2691.1723.camel@shane-asus-laptop> <20110126054054.GA27563@nsn.com> Message-ID: <89E451A077DD1D4E8815102F2C0693811A9E132990@exch003.1StopIT.local> I support the proposal. Kind regards Allan Eising Network Engineer IP Vision A/S > All, > > We have not received any input so far whether you support draft policy > 2010-06. While silence will in general be interpreted as consensus, we > prefer to have a good number of statements of support as that will make it > unequivocally clear that consensus was indeed reached. > > The last call period will end 2010-02-03 (Thursday, 3 February 2011). Please > e-mail any final comments to ipv6-wg at ripe.net before then. > > Thanks, > > David & Shane From nick at inex.ie Wed Jan 26 16:24:37 2011 From: nick at inex.ie (Nick Hilliard) Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 15:24:37 +0000 Subject: [address-policy-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg] 2010-06 is going to Last Call In-Reply-To: <20110126054054.GA27563@nsn.com> References: <1294320025.2691.1723.camel@shane-asus-laptop> <20110126054054.GA27563@nsn.com> Message-ID: <4D403CB5.4050102@inex.ie> On 26/01/2011 05:40, David Kessens wrote: > The last call period will end 2010-02-03 (Thursday, 3 February 2011). Please > e-mail any final comments to ipv6-wg at ripe.net before then. I agree with the proposal. Nick From denis at ripe.net Wed Jan 26 16:25:48 2011 From: denis at ripe.net (Denis Walker) Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 16:25:48 +0100 Subject: [address-policy-wg] Proposed Implementation Plan for Policy Proposal 2010-06 in the RIPE Database Message-ID: <4D403CFC.9050100@ripe.net> [Apologies for duplicate emails] Dear Colleagues, To prepare for the possible acceptance of RIPE Policy Proposal 2010-06, "Registration Requirements for IPv6 End User Assignments", the Database Group at the RIPE NCC proposes the following implementation plan. We will implement a new attribute ("assignment-size:") in INET6NUM objects, add some business logic for its use and add a new value (AGGREGATED-BY-LIR) for the "status:" attribute of an INET6NUM object. Schema and syntax changes in INET6NUM objects: - New attribute "assignment-size:" - Syntax is numeric value > 0 - INET6NUM object will include "assignment-size:" as an optional, single attribute - "assignment-size:" will not be an inverse searchable attribute - New value for the "status:" attribute of an INET6NUM object will be AGGREGATED-BY-LIR Business rules: - "assignment-size:" is optional in INET6NUM objects but required if "status:" is AGGREGATED-BY-LIR - The value of "assignment-size:" must be greater than the prefix size of the INET6NUM object containing the attribute - Parent status of INET6NUM object with status AGGREGATED-BY-LIR can be: ALLOCATED-BY-RIR ALLOCATED-BY-LIR AGGREGATED-BY-LIR - If parent status is AGGREGATED-BY-LIR, grandparent status cannot be AGGREGATED-BY-LIR - If an object has the status AGGREGATED-BY-LIR, a more specific object can only have the status AGGREGATED-BY-LIR (subject to the aforementioned constraints) We will prepare implementation of this plan during the week commencing 31 January 2011. It will be deployed during the week commencing 7 February 2011 should RIPE Policy Proposal 2010-06 be formally approved. Regards, Denis Walker Business Analyst RIPE NCC Database Group From LHOFFMAN at bouyguestelecom.fr Wed Jan 26 17:12:14 2011 From: LHOFFMAN at bouyguestelecom.fr (HOFFMANN, Lionel) Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 17:12:14 +0100 Subject: [address-policy-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg] 2010-06 is going to Last Call In-Reply-To: References: <1294320025.2691.1723.camel@shane-asus-laptop> <20110126054054.GA27563@nsn.com> Message-ID: OK I support this policy Lionel HOFFMANN Direction Technique Tel: 01 39 45 42 76 Mob: 06 60 31 42 76 Email: lhoffman at bouyguestelecom.fr Adresse: 13/15 avenue du Mar?chal juin 92360 MEUDON -----Message d'origine----- De : ipv6-wg-admin at ripe.net [mailto:ipv6-wg-admin at ripe.net] De la part de Chris Grundemann Envoy? : mercredi 26 janvier 2011 16:03 ? : David Kessens Cc : ipv6-wg; db-wg at ripe.net; address-policy-wg at ripe.net Objet : Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg] 2010-06 is going to Last Call On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 22:40, David Kessens wrote: > > [ Courtesy copy sent to address policy and database working groups. > Please > follow up on the ipv6-wg list. ] > > All, > > We have not received any input so far whether you support draft policy > 2010-06. While silence will in general be interpreted as consensus, we > prefer to have a good number of statements of support as that will > make it unequivocally clear that consensus was indeed reached. I support this policy. ~Chris > The last call period will end 2010-02-03 (Thursday, 3 February 2011). > Please e-mail any final comments to ipv6-wg at ripe.net before then. > > Thanks, > > David & Shane > --- > > On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 02:20:25PM +0100, Shane Kerr wrote: >> Hello, >> >> [ Courtesy copy sent to address policy and database working groups. >> Please >> follow up on the ipv6-wg list. ] >> >> The Review Phase for the RIPE policy proposal 2010-06 ended on >> 2010-12-27 (Monday, 27 December 2010). >> >> You can see the policy proposal here: >> >> http://ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2010-06.html >> >> There were some clarifications during the Review Phase, but nothing >> indicating changes needed. >> >> David and I have decided that the proposal is ready for a Last Call. >> (As co-author of the proposal, Marco has recused himself from any >> consensus >> judgments.) >> >> The last call period is four weeks, so will end 2010-02-03 (Thursday, >> 3 February 2011). Please e-mail any final comments to >> ipv6-wg at ripe.net before then. >> >> Thanks, >> >> -- >> Shane > > -- @ChrisGrundemann weblog.chrisgrundemann.com www.burningwiththebush.com www.theIPv6experts.net www.coisoc.org L'int?grit? de ce message n'?tant pas assur?e sur internet, la soci?t? exp?ditrice ne peut ?tre tenue responsable de son contenu ni de ses pi?ces jointes. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. The integrity of this message cannot be guaranteed on the Internet. The company that sent this message cannot therefore be held liable for its content nor attachments. Any unauthorized use or dissemination is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, then please delete it and notify the sender. From andy at nosignal.org Wed Jan 26 21:24:30 2011 From: andy at nosignal.org (Andy Davidson) Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 20:24:30 +0000 Subject: [address-policy-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg] 2010-06 is going to Last Call In-Reply-To: <20110126054054.GA27563@nsn.com> References: <1294320025.2691.1723.camel@shane-asus-laptop> <20110126054054.GA27563@nsn.com> Message-ID: On 26 Jan 2011, at 05:40, David Kessens wrote: > We have not received any input so far whether you support draft policy > 2010-06. While silence will in general be interpreted as consensus, we > prefer to have a good number of statements of support as that will make it > unequivocally clear that consensus was indeed reached. [...] >> http://ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2010-06.html I support this proposal. Andy From david.freedman at eu.clara.net Wed Jan 26 21:57:01 2011 From: david.freedman at eu.clara.net (David Freedman) Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 20:57:01 +0000 Subject: [address-policy-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg] 2010-06 is going to Last Call In-Reply-To: References: <1294320025.2691.1723.camel@shane-asus-laptop> <20110126054054.GA27563@nsn.com> Message-ID: <79C1BF34-5E37-48AF-9EC8-9C214D9E9A77@uk.clara.net> Support On 26 Jan 2011, at 20:42, "Andy Davidson" wrote: > > On 26 Jan 2011, at 05:40, David Kessens wrote: > >> We have not received any input so far whether you support draft policy >> 2010-06. While silence will in general be interpreted as consensus, we >> prefer to have a good number of statements of support as that will make it >> unequivocally clear that consensus was indeed reached. > [...] >>> http://ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2010-06.html > > I support this proposal. > > Andy > From Fritsche at iabg.de Thu Jan 27 08:48:14 2011 From: Fritsche at iabg.de (Fritsche Wolfgang) Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 07:48:14 +0000 Subject: [address-policy-wg] AW: [ipv6-wg] 2010-06 is going to Last Call In-Reply-To: <20110126054054.GA27563@nsn.com> References: <1294320025.2691.1723.camel@shane-asus-laptop>,<20110126054054.GA27563@nsn.com> Message-ID: <1A57CD3F2EA17346BB83C752FE423BE76C62C998@ExMbx1.iabg.de> I support this proposal. Wolfgang ________________________________________ Von: ipv6-wg-admin at ripe.net [ipv6-wg-admin at ripe.net]" im Auftrag von "David Kessens [david.kessens at nsn.com] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 26. Januar 2011 06:40 An: ipv6-wg Cc: db-wg at ripe.net; address-policy-wg at ripe.net Betreff: Re: [ipv6-wg] 2010-06 is going to Last Call [ Courtesy copy sent to address policy and database working groups. Please follow up on the ipv6-wg list. ] All, We have not received any input so far whether you support draft policy 2010-06. While silence will in general be interpreted as consensus, we prefer to have a good number of statements of support as that will make it unequivocally clear that consensus was indeed reached. The last call period will end 2010-02-03 (Thursday, 3 February 2011). Please e-mail any final comments to ipv6-wg at ripe.net before then. Thanks, David & Shane --- On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 02:20:25PM +0100, Shane Kerr wrote: > Hello, > > [ Courtesy copy sent to address policy and database working groups. Please > follow up on the ipv6-wg list. ] > > The Review Phase for the RIPE policy proposal 2010-06 ended on > 2010-12-27 (Monday, 27 December 2010). > > You can see the policy proposal here: > > http://ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2010-06.html > > There were some clarifications during the Review Phase, but nothing > indicating changes needed. > > David and I have decided that the proposal is ready for a Last Call. (As > co-author of the proposal, Marco has recused himself from any consensus > judgments.) > > The last call period is four weeks, so will end 2010-02-03 (Thursday, 3 > February 2011). Please e-mail any final comments to ipv6-wg at ripe.net > before then. > > Thanks, > > -- > Shane From LMELE at infoclip.fr Thu Jan 27 10:06:00 2011 From: LMELE at infoclip.fr (Laurent MELE) Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 10:06:00 +0100 Subject: [address-policy-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg] 2010-06 is going to Last Call In-Reply-To: References: <1294320025.2691.1723.camel@shane-asus-laptop> <20110126054054.GA27563@nsn.com> Message-ID: <830252D2E2E7E34084708CB626F2419440E1BC85DA@iliv.ifc.local> > We have not received any input so far whether you support draft policy > 2010-06. While silence will in general be interpreted as consensus, we > prefer to have a good number of statements of support as that will > make it unequivocally clear that consensus was indeed reached. [...] >> http://ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2010-06.html Support -- Laurent Mele Groupe INFOCLIP Directeur Technique 32 avenue Corentin Cariou 75 019 PARIS T?l : +33 (0) 1 43 18 19 20 Fax : +33 (0) 1 43 18 19 29 PGP KeyFingerPrint : 6E9D 5F72 6C21 1194 C00F? E6AC 6102 CCEA BD33 731A From emadaio at ripe.net Thu Jan 27 15:34:06 2011 From: emadaio at ripe.net (Emilio Madaio) Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 15:34:06 +0100 Subject: [address-policy-wg] 2010-07 Policy Proposal Withdrawn (Ambiguity cleanup on IPv6 Address Space Policy for IXP) Message-ID: <20110127143406.5A0086A002@postboy.ripe.net> Dear Colleagues, The proposed change to RIPE Document ripe-451 has been withdrawn. It is now archived and can be found at: http://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2010-07.html The reason for withdrawal is: the editorial text change proposed will be discussed in the Cosmetic Surgery Project Regards Emilio Madaio Policy Development Officer RIPE NCC From Ragnar.Anfinsen at altibox.no Fri Jan 28 10:00:25 2011 From: Ragnar.Anfinsen at altibox.no (Anfinsen, Ragnar) Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 10:00:25 +0100 Subject: SV: [address-policy-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg] 2010-06 is going to Last Call In-Reply-To: <20110126054054.GA27563@nsn.com> References: <1294320025.2691.1723.camel@shane-asus-laptop> <20110126054054.GA27563@nsn.com> Message-ID: +1 Regards Ragnar Anfinsen Altibox AS [ Courtesy copy sent to address policy and database working groups. Please follow up on the ipv6-wg list. ] All, We have not received any input so far whether you support draft policy 2010-06. While silence will in general be interpreted as consensus, we prefer to have a good number of statements of support as that will make it unequivocally clear that consensus was indeed reached. The last call period will end 2010-02-03 (Thursday, 3 February 2011). Please e-mail any final comments to ipv6-wg at ripe.net before then. Thanks, David & Shane --- On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 02:20:25PM +0100, Shane Kerr wrote: > Hello, > > [ Courtesy copy sent to address policy and database working groups. Please > follow up on the ipv6-wg list. ] > > The Review Phase for the RIPE policy proposal 2010-06 ended on > 2010-12-27 (Monday, 27 December 2010). > > You can see the policy proposal here: > > http://ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2010-06.html > > There were some clarifications during the Review Phase, but nothing > indicating changes needed. > > David and I have decided that the proposal is ready for a Last Call. (As > co-author of the proposal, Marco has recused himself from any consensus > judgments.) > > The last call period is four weeks, so will end 2010-02-03 (Thursday, 3 > February 2011). Please e-mail any final comments to ipv6-wg at ripe.net > before then. > > Thanks, > > -- > Shane From alexb at ripe.net Mon Jan 31 09:30:25 2011 From: alexb at ripe.net (Alex Band) Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 09:30:25 +0100 Subject: [address-policy-wg] RIPE NCC Resource Certification service update Message-ID: Dear colleagues, It's been one month since I sent the announcement about the RIPE NCC Resource Certification service. I would like to give you an overview of the current status. The facts by numbers: ------------------------------ LIRs who have enabled the service: 219 Number of Route Origin Authorisations they created: 170 Number of prefixes covered by these ROAs: 469 Total IPv4 space covered by ROAs in the RIPE region: 40159 /24s Total IPv6 space covered by ROAs in the RIPE region: 7340035 /48s Unique visitors to ripe.net/certification: 1564 Downloads of the RIPE NCC Validator: 117 So while 219 LIRs have enabled the service, and very diligently created a large number of ROAs to specify their routing policy, unfortunately nobody gave any feedback on any of the mailing lists. It is very important that you let your voice be heard and provide input on policy proposal 2008-08: http://ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2008-08.html Please note that version 3.0 of this proposal will be published very soon. As soon as it is available, I urge you to read it and provide feedback, because the fact that the current service not backed by a policy is not a sustainable state of affairs. Kind regards, Alex Band Product Manager, RIPE NCC http://ripe.net/certification P.S. Here are some links courtesy of LACNIC in case you would like to track the progress: http://www.labs.lacnic.net/~rpki/rpki-monitor/rpki-ta-status.xml http://www.labs.lacnic.net/~rpki/rpki-evolution-report_EN.txt http://www.labs.lacnic.net/~rpki/rpki-heatmaps/latest/ripe-roa-heatmap.png -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 1728 bytes Desc: not available URL: