[address-policy-wg] Re: Re: Re: Re: IPv6 PI resource question!

On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 02:15:40PM +0100, Shane Kerr wrote:
> Right. So peering with a vendor to gain access to certain services or
> databases while also connecting to the Internet, for example?

Yep.

> Why do you need a split DNS? Just publish your local information on the
> Internet.

ULA are not supposed to be Internet routable, so you would have to
present globally routable PA space-de-jour AAAA to DNS requestors from
"the Internet", and present stable ULA AAAA to others.

> If your concern is with hiding information about internal networks for
> whatever reason (security, trade secrets, and so on), then you'll need
> some sort of split DNS anyway.

No, that's not my (personal) concern in this debate for now.

> (And I won't address the 6to4 suggestion, which you realize isn't
> entirely serious.) ;)

*phew* :-)

Best regards,
Daniel

-- 
CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: dr at cluenet.de -- dr at IRCnet -- PGP: 0xA85C8AA0