[address-policy-wg] Re: Re: IPv6 PI resource question!
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: IPv6 PI resource question!
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: Re: IPv6 PI resource question!
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Daniel Roesen
dr at cluenet.de
Tue Feb 15 10:47:27 CET 2011
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 10:14:41AM +0100, Shane Kerr wrote: > * ULA addresses, with random addresses Doesn't work for hybrids unless NAT is used for the (potentially single-homed) Internet connection. Didn't we want to avoid NAT? > * 6to4 addresses, using one or more of your IPv4 addresses "What IPv4 addresses?" :-) Best regards, Daniel -- CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: dr at cluenet.de -- dr at IRCnet -- PGP: 0xA85C8AA0
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: IPv6 PI resource question!
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: Re: IPv6 PI resource question!
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]