[address-policy-wg] status of 2011-02
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] status of 2011-02
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] status of 2011-02
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Mon Dec 12 15:33:10 CET 2011
Hi, On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 02:22:19PM +0000, Hendrik T. Voelker wrote: > On 12/12/11 13:17, Randy Bush wrote: > >> There are so many people using as the main and the last argument the > >> concern about weak distribution of IPv6 > > > > have faith. [...] there are no clear business incentives to > > go through the effort. > > Oh there is but They do not want to see that. Only when they very suddenly and > in a great hurry have to migrate all their infrastructure to IPv6 They will > mumble something like it would have been a good idea to to that earlier. Folks, may I call you to order, please? Feel free to discuss the merits of migrating to IPv6 or not - but if you want to do so, please change the Subject: line accordingly. This would be a new thread, and is not related to the question that needs discussing in *this* thread: has consensus been reached on 2011-02 or not. Thanks. Gert Doering -- APWG chair -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] status of 2011-02
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] status of 2011-02
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]