[address-policy-wg] defining consensus
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] defining consensus
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] status of 2011-02
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
DI. Thomas Schallar
t.schallar at avalon.at
Fri Dec 9 11:22:11 CET 2011
Jim Reid schrieb am 09.12.2011 10:31: > Incidentally, consensus in a WG is whatever its chairs decide is > consensus. That's why they're there. :-) And why there are further > steps in the PDP to check that decision. If a small number object to a > proposal that otherwise has overwhelming support, the WG chairs can > quite reasonably declare consensus on that proposal. I totally support that!!! :-) You may never ever get 100.0% agreement for /any/ decision. Nevertheless, a decision has to be made eventually. That's one big problem in democracy and there's no solution to that. Thomas -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20111209/e0101f36/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] defining consensus
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] status of 2011-02
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]