[address-policy-wg] PI for IPv6 == PI for IPv4?
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] PI for IPv6 == PI for IPv4?
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] PI for IPv6 == PI for IPv4?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Turchanyi Geza
turchanyi.geza at gmail.com
Wed Aug 17 19:41:30 CEST 2011
Hi Alex, May I interpret your slide29 in this way: 3,5% off the address space had been allocated as PI in the RIPE NCC service region and this PI address space is responsible for 21% of the BGP prefixes (originated in this region). So 3,5% AND 21%.... In IPv6 PI this ratio probably will be even worse... Best, Géza On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 3:01 PM, Alex Le Heux <alexlh at ripe.net> wrote: > Dear Wilfried, > > On Aug 10, 2011, at 12:23, Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet wrote: > > > Without wanting to imply anything, just providing us with real figures - > > > > iirc NCC Registration Services has given a very nice report recently (at > 61 > > or 62? a recent NRO report?), listing the number of PI assignmenet vs the > number > > of PA allocations, and the percentage of space given out for the 2 > categories. > > > > Unfortunately, I cannot find this/those presentation/s on short notice > right now. > > Maybe the NCC can help? > > At RIPE62 I presented the following: > > http://ripe62.ripe.net/presentations/209-apwg.pdf > (PI section starts at slide 9, numbers from 25 onwards) > > Adding the IPv4 PI vs the IPv4 ALLOCATED blocks the RIPE NCC has on file at > the moment, we see that 3.5% of all IPv4 IPs handed out were > assigned/allocated as PI. > > Best regards, > > Alex Le Heux > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20110817/b6d8dc92/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] PI for IPv6 == PI for IPv4?
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] PI for IPv6 == PI for IPv4?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]