[address-policy-wg] PI for IPv6 == PI for IPv4?
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] PI for IPv6 == PI for IPv4?
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] PI for IPv6 == PI for IPv4?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Masataka Ohta
mohta at necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp
Wed Aug 10 13:46:47 CEST 2011
James Blessing wrote: > Since with IPv6 you are unlikely to be using the IP addresses for > anything in day to day use (unlike v4 where you still see lots of > manual configuration) The reality is that stateless auto configuration is not really stateless and no better than DHCP. > and there are explicit functions from an end > device to use multiple IP addresses it makes sense to change end user > configuration to an automated function. As is proven by hosts with an IPv4 and an IPv6 addresses, IPv6 does not support hosts with multiple addresses better than IPv4. Masataka Ohta
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] PI for IPv6 == PI for IPv4?
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] PI for IPv6 == PI for IPv4?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]