[address-policy-wg] PI for IPv6 == PI for IPv4?
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] PI for IPv6 == PI for IPv4?
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: Status of 2011-02 Policy Proposal (Removal of multihomed requirement for IPv6)?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Marcin Kuczera
marcin at leon.pl
Wed Aug 10 12:53:00 CEST 2011
Erik Bais wrote: > Hi Adrian, > > They can't get IPv6 PI for hosting business.. But would they to enable IPv6 for their own infrastructure ? If they wouldn't give addresses to other entities, they would still fit within the same rules as any other end-customer. yeap, and recently such cases were sent to "hell" with the reason "IPv6 PI is only available with direct agreement Customer-RIPE" Regards, Marcin
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] PI for IPv6 == PI for IPv4?
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: Status of 2011-02 Policy Proposal (Removal of multihomed requirement for IPv6)?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]