[address-policy-wg] Re: [policy-announce] 2006-05 New Draft Document Published (PI Assignment Size)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [policy-announce] 2006-05 New Draft Document Published (PI Assignment Size)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] getting second IPv6 PA as a LIR
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Marcin Kuczera
marcin at leon.pl
Tue Apr 26 23:40:48 CEST 2011
Erik Bais wrote: > Hi Nick, > >> On 01/02/2011 11:14, Erik Bais wrote: >>> I was wondering what the status is of this policy. > >> Hi Eric, > >> It's blocking on me to re-formulate and send back to the working group. >> Unfortunately, I'm just tied up with other stuff at the moment. I'm > hoping >> to get time to deal with this soon. > >> Nick > > I noticed that the policy is scheduled on the agenda for the next RIPE > meeting, but I didn't see anything change in status yet. > > Did anything change to its currently published form and how it is on the > RIPE website published ? > > If not, it is possible to get this phase concluded asap for the following > reasons : > > 1) We are about to shift the period of assignment for PI from 6 months to 3 > months. And by not having something like this in place, we'll end up with PI > space that is un-routable, as everyone (or at least a large portion of > ISP's) is filtering everything smaller than a /24. > 2) For LIR's, being able to do a PI request, without having to make up the > story upto the next /24, will make things a lot easier. > 3) For the IPRA's, reduction in workload as they don't have to shift through > all the made up stories on PI requests and actual legitimate PI requests. > > As some might say that this policy is out-dated due to the nearby IPv4 > depletion, it would be my statement that this is the moment why you would > want this and want this ASAP for the above mentioned reasons. > > In short, can we move ahead with this and yes I do support this. :) Hello, I'am new here, from land of massive PI requests ;) We are LIR providing SponsorLIR service for little ISPs in Poland. Providing /24 as the smallest entity is a good idea in my opinion, however because little ISPs "wake up" recently willing to replace their i.e. /22 PA to PI (to be multihomed and independent) I hope that getting more than /24 will still be possible - of course if still available in RIR resources. Regards, Marcin >> You can find the full proposal at: > >> http://ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2006-05.html > >> and the draft document at: > >> http://ripe.net/ripe/draft-documents/ripe-492-draft2006-05.html > > Regards, > Erik Bais > >
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [policy-announce] 2006-05 New Draft Document Published (PI Assignment Size)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] getting second IPv6 PA as a LIR
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]