This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] the cost of PI space
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] the cost of PI space
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] the cost of PI space
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Erik Bais
ebais at a2b-internet.com
Fri Apr 15 16:10:31 CEST 2011
Hi Immo, > I am working for such a non profit organization voluntarely (as all of > our staff does) and I can assure you that fundraising money for > servers/routers is not easy for us. When it comes to periodic costs, it > is always a trade off between more bandwith/more servers (= increased > power costs) and other things (like address space, lir membership fees, > etc). So while most end users of independet ressources might not even > notice a shift from 50 euros per anno to 500 euros per anno, at least > for us that would make things seriously more difficult. After all, > thats why we decided not to become a LIR (eventhough it would otherwise > fit better then usage of independend ressources). Looking at the cost for PI purely from the viewpoint of a foundation isn't realistic imho. There are plenty of LIR's that actually sponsor the cost of PI to a foundation, especially if it is strategic for the foundation their operations. Not knowing what kind of foundation you are working for, but foundations that come to my mind that would require PI and multihoming: Wikimedia or AMS-IX or alike. Looking at reasonable cost for PI IPv6 (when the multihoming requirement would be removed) in my opinion, should be around 250 euro yearly. Rationale for that 250 euro cost is: . The cost will most likely be enough to remove IT Pet project requests behind a DSL line @home . That kind of yearly cost for PI IPv6 still provides small business and even non-profits the option to start with IPv6 deployment if it is strategic for them to have their own IP's, without hindering IPv6 adoption and deployment. In fact, when the cost for PI IPv6 would increase but the requirement for multihoming is dropped, SMB's & foundations are in a better place than currently as it will be cheaper for them to use PI IPv6 space. They don't have to setup a complete multi-homed environment, but could just ask their 'ISP of the month' to route their IP space for them and use their redundant setup. Running a multi-homing environment isn't for the fainthearted . . . and certainly not cheap or easy. And if you can't make the (strategic/financial) business case to shell out 250 euro yearly for PI IPv6, you can always ask your ISP for regular PA IPv6. Regards, Erik Bais
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] the cost of PI space
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] the cost of PI space
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]