[address-policy-wg] Suggested updates to 2010-05 (Global Policy for IPv4 Allocation by the IANA post exhaustion)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Suggested updates to 2010-05 (Global Policy for IPv4 Allocation by the IANA post exhaustion)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Suggested updates to 2010-05 (Global Policy for IPv4 Allocation by the IANA post exhaustion)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nick Hilliard
nick at inex.ie
Tue Sep 21 00:26:36 CEST 2010
On 19/09/2010 19:12, Chris Grundemann wrote: > Problem #1: The allocation method was unfair. "Fairness" is a remarkably mercurial concept which has little or no meaning in an environment of plenty. It's much easier to talk about "unfairness": which is the state of mind of candidate A, when candidate B receives preferential treatment. Just look at squabbling children and their exquisitely honed sense of personal injustice. I would suggest that - regardless of the rules set up now - there will be a lot of "unfairness" and "injustice" of this sort once address space exhaustion hits. Nick
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Suggested updates to 2010-05 (Global Policy for IPv4 Allocation by the IANA post exhaustion)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Suggested updates to 2010-05 (Global Policy for IPv4 Allocation by the IANA post exhaustion)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]