[address-policy-wg] Proposal 2010-2
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Proposal 2010-2
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Proposal 2010-2
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Per Heldal
heldal at eml.cc
Sat Oct 30 01:31:03 CEST 2010
On Fri, 2010-10-29 at 17:27 -0400, Milton L Mueller wrote: > > > > > Question 2: why wouldn't LIR 1 form a new company and call it a > > startup to get privileged access to addresses? Or, might LIR 3, LIR 1's > > long standing competitor, form a new LIR to gain an advantage in the > > competition for resources? > > > > > Most, if not all, networks of significant size have a small > > chunk of spare addresses they can recycle for transition services. A > > new LIR OTOH has nothing and could theoretically be blocked from entering > > the market. > > And Question 2? That's best answered with a question. What's the point for an established LIR to go through all that trouble just to get another tiny block? A small hosting-operation might have some use for it, but it makes no sense for your example LIR (regional, national or multi-national network operator). //per
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Proposal 2010-2
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Proposal 2010-2
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]