[eix-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] 2010-07 New Policy Proposal (Ambiguity cleanup on IPv6 Address Space Policy for IXP)

On 25 Oct 2010, at 16:52, Gert Doering wrote:

> Input from the IXP folks is more than welcome, of course.  You help us define "what is an IXP?", we make a policy that works for you... :-)

I am in favour of light touch policy - let each ixp have some simple/relevant rules on connection (which will always have to be specific to their own market, region, culture), write the rules down, and follow them.

If you have a policy which is enforced equally, then for the purpose of this policy, it is 'open' - because the ixp is open about the policy.

In terms of the policy, my current preference is 'there must be a clear and documented policy'.  My second preference is the wording suggested by Emilio.  My last preference is the current wording.


-- 
Best wishes
Andy Davidson
eix-wg co-chair, personal capacity.