[address-policy-wg] 2006-05 New Draft Document Published (PI Assignment Size)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-05 New Draft Document Published (PI Assignment Size)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-05 New Draft Document Published (PI Assignment Size)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
James Blessing
james.blessing at despres.co.uk
Thu Oct 21 14:05:49 CEST 2010
On 21 October 2010 13:01, Nick Hilliard <nick at inex.ie> wrote: > On 21/10/2010 12:48, James Blessing wrote: >> >> Either I'm going mental or doesn't the line: >> >> "Cumulatively, no more than 248 additional IPv4 addresses may be >> assigned to any particular End User for the purposes outlined in >> section 6.10." >> >> make the proposal completely pointless > > In what regard? "The RIPE NCC will assign additional IPv4 addresses to an End User in order to make the assignment size a multiple of a /24" Last time I looked /24 = 256 addresses Therefore you can't give a 'new' end user a /24 as they have no address space to return and 256 > 248. If it was 2048 then I could understand the logic... J -- James Blessing 07989 039 476
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-05 New Draft Document Published (PI Assignment Size)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-05 New Draft Document Published (PI Assignment Size)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]