[address-policy-wg] Re: Re: Unique prefixes for all proposals
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: Re: Unique prefixes for all proposals
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] ripe-doc- as a prefix
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Richard Hartmann
richih.mailinglist at gmail.com
Thu Nov 25 14:39:11 CET 2010
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 13:59, Jaap Akkerhuis <jaap at nlnetlabs.nl> wrote: > What people are > actual asking for is a decent way to find RIPE (drafts-) documents. As the person who proposed this, I have to disagree. What I was asking about was a way to know if "proposal 1234-56" refers to a proposal within the RIPE or the ARIN community. That being said,... > And that by various methods (keyword search, search by workgroup, > policy type). One might be better of with something like the IETF > <http://tools.ietf.org/html/> or the tools on <http://tools.ietf.org/html/> > then a "trick to encode a look up scheme in an identifier". (Thnk > DNS versus a Google search). ...appending yet another integer to mark versions is A Good Thing. Though I, personally, would simply set up gitweb or similar and dump everything in there. IETF's datatracker is OK-ish, but leaves a lot to be desired. Plus, keeping everything in a VCS allows everyone to read, track, compare and revisit history with a myriad of tools of their own choice, at a place of their choice, with the interface of their choice instead of forcing them to be online and to use a website. Richard PS: Thanks to Nick Hiliard for his mail.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: Re: Unique prefixes for all proposals
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] ripe-doc- as a prefix
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]