[address-policy-wg] Re: Re: Unique prefixes for all proposals
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: Re: Unique prefixes for all proposals
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: Re: Unique prefixes for all proposals
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Richard Hartmann
richih.mailinglist at gmail.com
Thu Nov 25 12:57:30 CET 2010
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 12:09, Rob Evans <rhe at nosc.ja.net> wrote: > Could we also then use GLOBAL-PDP-YYYY-NN to maintain a constant number > across all regions for global policy proposals? Or do I just need to learn > to remember which is which? "Global" is far from ideal, imo. It's not unique at all. rirs-pdp- ? > However, having to put all the changes for each RIR into a single document > will probably mean changes to the process in each region to cope with that, > and I'm very conscious that when we get to the point of spending too much > time fiddling with the process itself, it is time to look at what bits of it > we need at all. A rirs-pdp-1234 could simply reference the individual local working copy with backrefs from said copies to the global one. An alternative about which I am unsure myself would be ripe-global-pdp-1234-56, arin-global-pdp-1234-56 etc pp. Far from ideal, but as we are brainstorming... Richard
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: Re: Unique prefixes for all proposals
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: Re: Unique prefixes for all proposals
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]