[address-policy-wg] Re: Re: Unique prefixes for all proposals
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: Re: Unique prefixes for all proposals
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: Re: Unique prefixes for all proposals
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
João Damas
joao at bondis.org
Wed Nov 24 21:59:49 CET 2010
On 24 Nov 2010, at 20:51, Dmitry Burkov wrote: > On 24.11.10 22:38, Remco Van Mook wrote: >>> Well, rip-123 will always be correctly addressed as ripe-123. It's just that ripe- >>> doc-1234 would could be called ripe-1234. I don't see any confusion arising >>> from that and the normal document churn would take care of any potential >>> confusion, anyway. >> The confusion is that, for the next 25 years or so, people will be wondering what the relation is between ripe-<foo> and ripe-doc-<bar> documents. Which one replaces which other one? >> >> So again, please don't. > Agreed, as don't see any real needs and only future problems. +1 Joao
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: Re: Unique prefixes for all proposals
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: Re: Unique prefixes for all proposals
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]