[address-policy-wg] Re: Re: Unique prefixes for all proposals
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: Re: Unique prefixes for all proposals
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: Re: Unique prefixes for all proposals
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Marco Hogewoning
marcoh at marcoh.net
Wed Nov 24 20:49:21 CET 2010
On 24 nov 2010, at 20:38, Remco Van Mook wrote: >> >> Well, rip-123 will always be correctly addressed as ripe-123. It's just that ripe- >> doc-1234 would could be called ripe-1234. I don't see any confusion arising >> from that and the normal document churn would take care of any potential >> confusion, anyway. > > The confusion is that, for the next 25 years or so, people will be wondering what the relation is between ripe-<foo> and ripe-doc-<bar> documents. Which one replaces which other one? > > So again, please don't. > +1 MarcoH (as a private citizen)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: Re: Unique prefixes for all proposals
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: Re: Unique prefixes for all proposals
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]