[address-policy-wg] Re: Re: Unique prefixes for all proposals
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: Re: Unique prefixes for all proposals
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: Re: Unique prefixes for all proposals
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Richard Hartmann
richih.mailinglist at gmail.com
Wed Nov 24 18:49:38 CET 2010
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 17:01, Remco Van Mook <Remco.vanMook at eu.equinix.com> wrote: > I'm more than happy to support your idea for the naming convention of policy proposals. Thanks :) > I'll stick to my point of the actual documents however - history does not soft-link. Especially when people are expected to comply (which is the main reason for both protocol and policy to begin with) it's crucial to have a single name attached to it. Eternal confusion arises when you don't. Well, rip-123 will always be correctly addressed as ripe-123. It's just that ripe-doc-1234 would could be called ripe-1234. I don't see any confusion arising from that and the normal document churn would take care of any potential confusion, anyway. But again, I don't think there would be any confusion. RIchard
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: Re: Unique prefixes for all proposals
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: Re: Unique prefixes for all proposals
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]