[address-policy-wg] Re: Re: Unique prefixes for all proposals
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: Unique prefixes for all proposals
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: Re: Unique prefixes for all proposals
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Daniel Roesen
dr at cluenet.de
Wed Nov 24 11:56:57 CET 2010
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 11:19:24AM +0100, Richard Hartmann wrote: > > PDP is redundant since your suggested prefix applies to policy proposals. > > To be fair, the prefix scheme might be adapted to other uses as well. > For example, it might make sense to use ripe-doc- for documents, at > some point. That was indeed one of the reasons for my suggestion. Clearly separate namespace, adaptable to other documents/objects as well. I should probably have explained that explicitly. Best regards, Daniel -- CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: dr at cluenet.de -- dr at IRCnet -- PGP: 0xA85C8AA0
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: Unique prefixes for all proposals
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: Re: Unique prefixes for all proposals
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]