This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] Registry - not a policy proposal
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Registry - not a policy proposal
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Registry - not a policy proposal
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Toni Stoev
irtf at tonistoev.info
Wed May 5 12:02:31 CEST 2010
On Wednesday 05 May 2010 at 11:15:36 Rob Blokzijl sent: > > [apologies for duplicate mails] > > Dear RIPE, > > soon there will be no more IPv4. However, we still have a registry > of these addresses. Perhaps you mean "no more unallocated IPv4 addresses". > > Daniel Karrenberg and myself have produced a document (attached to > this mail) which describes what we think the role of this registry > should be after the runout of the unallocated IPv4 address space. > > We will present this document in the Address Policy WG, and would > like to invite you to let us know your thoughts. The place for > further discussion will be <address-policy-wg at ripe.net>. > > Thank you for your attention, > > Rob Blokzijl
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Registry - not a policy proposal
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Registry - not a policy proposal
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]