This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
AW: [address-policy-wg] 2010-02 New Policy Proposal (Allocations from the last /8)
- Previous message (by thread): AW: [address-policy-wg] 2010-02 New Policy Proposal (Allocations from the last /8)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Reminder: Global IPv6 Deployment Monitoring Survey
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nick Hilliard
nick at inex.ie
Fri Jun 18 16:18:29 CEST 2010
On 17/06/2010 13:06, Marcus.Gerdon wrote: > Is there a limitation on the size of a PI assignment in place at some > time in any one of the lately changed policies? I don't think that there's an explicit limit. > As soon as I got that last /22 allocation which policy keeps me from > requesting a /19 PI for our own use? ah, yes, good point. This is certainly somthing that needs to be looked at. Nick
- Previous message (by thread): AW: [address-policy-wg] 2010-02 New Policy Proposal (Allocations from the last /8)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Reminder: Global IPv6 Deployment Monitoring Survey
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]