[address-policy-wg] 2010-02 New Draft Document Published (Allocations from the last /8)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2010-02 New Draft Document Published (Allocations from the last /8)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2010-02 New Draft Document Published (Allocations from the last /8)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Max Tulyev
president at ukraine.su
Wed Jul 7 15:38:16 CEST 2010
Gennady, for now it is bad. But when there will be a lack of IPv4, we have to sacrifice aggregation in favour to conservation. The difference is the independence. PA is not. Gennady A. написав(ла): > Max, > /29 in the global routing table is a bad thing. > > Those who need multihoming may use PA address space. Now, when > contracts to support address space are necessery, there isn't much > dfference between PI and PA. -- WBR, Max Tulyev (MT6561-RIPE, 2:463/253 at FIDO)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2010-02 New Draft Document Published (Allocations from the last /8)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2010-02 New Draft Document Published (Allocations from the last /8)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]