From andrea at ripe.net Wed Dec 1 12:36:13 2010 From: andrea at ripe.net (Andrea Cima) Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 12:36:13 +0100 Subject: [address-policy-wg] New IPv4 blocks allocated to RIPE NCC Message-ID: <4CF6332D.3070407@ripe.net> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 [Apologies for duplicate mails] Dear Colleagues, The RIPE NCC received the IPv4 address ranges 5/8 and 37/8 from the IANA in November 2010. We will begin allocating from these ranges in the near future. The minimum allocation size for these two /8s has been set at /21. You may wish to adjust any filters you have in place accordingly. More information on the IP space administered by the RIPE NCC can be found on our web site at: Additionally, please note that three "pilot" prefixes will be announced from each /8. The prefixes are: 5.0.0.0/16 5.1.0.0/21 5.1.24.0/24 37.0.0.0/16 37.1.0.0/21 37.1.24.0/24 They all originate in AS12654. More information on this "pilot" activity is available in the draft document "De-Bogonising New Address Blocks" which can be found at: Kind regards, Andrea Cima Registration Services Manager RIPE NCC -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.11 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkz2My0ACgkQXOgsmPkFrjOT7wCgnNa0eUFwK/ebtSeus3YgMoxZ GnUAnRAPMBMth/eSgX2F/opnY0fQI+Co =z5iw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From emadaio at ripe.net Wed Dec 1 16:16:52 2010 From: emadaio at ripe.net (Emilio Madaio) Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 16:16:52 +0100 Subject: [address-policy-wg] 2010-09 Policy Proposal Withdrawn (Frequent Update Request) Message-ID: <20101201151652.55E286A002@postboy.ripe.net> Dear Colleagues, The proposal has been withdrawn. It is now archived and can be found at: http://ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2010-09.html Reason for withdrawal: the proposer decided to withdraw the proposal based on the feedback received at RIPE 61. A task force will be organised to solve the implementation issues pointed out by the proposal discussion. Regards Emilio Madaio Policy Development Officer RIPE NCC From Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu Wed Dec 1 17:27:31 2010 From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu) Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 11:27:31 -0500 Subject: [address-policy-wg] Re: New IPv4 blocks allocated to RIPE NCC In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 01 Dec 2010 12:36:13 +0100." <4CF6332D.3070407@ripe.net> References: <4CF6332D.3070407@ripe.net> Message-ID: <12515.1291220851@localhost> On Wed, 01 Dec 2010 12:36:13 +0100, Andrea Cima said: > Additionally, please note that three "pilot" prefixes will be announced > from each /8. The prefixes are: > > 5.0.0.0/16 > 5.1.0.0/21 > 5.1.24.0/24 > > 37.0.0.0/16 > 37.1.0.0/21 > 37.1.24.0/24 > > They all originate in AS12654. Is there a pingable test address target in these prefixes? -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 227 bytes Desc: not available URL: From emadaio at ripe.net Thu Dec 2 16:12:44 2010 From: emadaio at ripe.net (Emilio Madaio) Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2010 16:12:44 +0100 Subject: [address-policy-wg] RIPE 60 Address Policy WG Meeting approved and published Message-ID: <4CF7B76C.3040706@ripe.net> Dear colleagues, The minutes from the Address Policy Working Group session from RIPE 60 were approved during RIPE 61. The minutes are available here: http://ripe.net/ripe/wg/address-policy/minutes.html Best Regards, Emilio Madaio Policy Development Officer RIPE NCC From eromijn at ripe.net Thu Dec 2 15:25:02 2010 From: eromijn at ripe.net (Erik Romijn) Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2010 15:25:02 +0100 Subject: [address-policy-wg] Re: [routing-wg] Re: New IPv4 blocks allocated to RIPE NCC In-Reply-To: <12515.1291220851@localhost> References: <4CF6332D.3070407@ripe.net> <12515.1291220851@localhost> Message-ID: <4CF7AC3E.60003@ripe.net> Hello Valdis, On 12/1/10 5:27 PM, Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu wrote: > On Wed, 01 Dec 2010 12:36:13 +0100, Andrea Cima said: >> Additionally, please note that three "pilot" prefixes will be announced >> from each /8. The prefixes are: >> >> 5.0.0.0/16 >> 37.0.0.0/16 >> [..] > > Is there a pingable test address target in these prefixes? Yes, all pilot prefixes have a pingable address configured. All current pilot prefixes and their pingable addresses are listed in the table on: http://www.ris.ripe.net/debogon/ kind regards, Erik Romijn Information Services RIPE NCC From emadaio at ripe.net Mon Dec 13 15:44:59 2010 From: emadaio at ripe.net (Emilio Madaio) Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 15:44:59 +0100 Subject: [address-policy-wg] 2010-06 New Policy Proposal (Registration Requirements for IPv6 End User Assignments) Message-ID: <20101213144459.ABDD56A002@postboy.ripe.net> Dear Colleagues, The IPv6 WG Chairs have decided that the proposal 2010-06 is ready for a 2 week Review Phase. Marco Hogewoning did not participate to the decision as he is a co-proposer. Following the feedback received, the draft documents for this proposal have been published. The impact analysis that was conducted for this proposal has also been published. You can find the full proposal at: http://ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2010-06.html and the draft documents at: http://ripe.net/ripe/draft-documents/ripe-481-draft2010-06.html http://ripe.net/ripe/draft-documents/ripe-new-draft2010-06.html We encourage you to read the draft document text and send any comments to ipv6-wg at ripe.net before 27 December 2010. Regards Emilio Madaio Policy Development Officer RIPE NCC From emadaio at ripe.net Wed Dec 15 16:14:17 2010 From: emadaio at ripe.net (Emilio Madaio) Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 16:14:17 +0100 Subject: [address-policy-wg] 2010-10 New Policy Proposal (Global Policy for IPv4 Allocation by the IANA post exhaustion) Message-ID: <20101215151418.354B66A00E@postboy.ripe.net> Dear Colleagues, A new version for the Global Policy Proposal has been presented at the RIPE 61 meeting in Rome. The new text has been produced and is now available for discussion. You can find the full proposal at: http://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2010-05.html We encourage you to review this proposal and send your comments to before 12 January 2011. Regards Emilio Madaio Policy Development Officer RIPE NCC From emadaio at ripe.net Thu Dec 16 17:08:35 2010 From: emadaio at ripe.net (Emilio Madaio) Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 17:08:35 +0100 Subject: [address-policy-wg] 2010-07 New Draft Document Published (Ambiguity cleanup on IPv6 Address Space Policy for IXP) Message-ID: <20101216160835.B3AA06A016@postboy.ripe.net> Dear Colleagues, The draft document for the proposal described in 2010-07 has been published. The impact analysis that was conducted for this proposal has also been published. You can find the full proposal at: http://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2010-07.html and the draft document at: http://www.ripe.net/ripe/draft-documents/ripe-451-draft2010-07.html We encourage you to read the draft document text and send any comments to address-policy-wg at ripe.net before 13 January 2011. Regards Emilio Madaio Policy Development Officer RIPE NCC From james.blessing at despres.co.uk Thu Dec 16 20:25:41 2010 From: james.blessing at despres.co.uk (James Blessing) Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 19:25:41 +0000 Subject: [address-policy-wg] 2010-07 New Draft Document Published (Ambiguity cleanup on IPv6 Address Space Policy for IXP) In-Reply-To: <20101216160835.B3AA06A016@postboy.ripe.net> References: <20101216160835.B3AA06A016@postboy.ripe.net> Message-ID: On 16 December 2010 16:08, Emilio Madaio wrote: > We encourage you to read the draft document text and send any comments > to address-policy-wg at ripe.net before 13 January 2011. I thought the consensus was to use 'published' rather than 'clear' J -- James Blessing 07989 039 476 From sander at steffann.nl Thu Dec 16 23:53:37 2010 From: sander at steffann.nl (Sander Steffann) Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 23:53:37 +0100 Subject: [address-policy-wg] 2010-07 New Draft Document Published (Ambiguity cleanup on IPv6 Address Space Policy for IXP) In-Reply-To: References: <20101216160835.B3AA06A016@postboy.ripe.net> Message-ID: <267D3758-ADA0-4AFA-91B2-2A7DEEA8B5F0@steffann.nl> Hi James, > On 16 December 2010 16:08, Emilio Madaio wrote: >> We encourage you to read the draft document text and send any comments >> to address-policy-wg at ripe.net before 13 January 2011. > > I thought the consensus was to use 'published' rather than 'clear' I think you are correct. 'Published' is also much easier to verify for the IPRA's than 'clear'. Unfortunately the webcasts are not available online yet, but IIRC there was agreement to use 'published'. Does anybody remember differently? Thanks, Sander From rhe at nosc.ja.net Fri Dec 17 00:05:03 2010 From: rhe at nosc.ja.net (Rob Evans) Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 23:05:03 +0000 Subject: [address-policy-wg] 2010-07 New Draft Document Published (Ambiguity cleanup on IPv6 Address Space Policy for IXP) In-Reply-To: <267D3758-ADA0-4AFA-91B2-2A7DEEA8B5F0@steffann.nl> References: <20101216160835.B3AA06A016@postboy.ripe.net> <267D3758-ADA0-4AFA-91B2-2A7DEEA8B5F0@steffann.nl> Message-ID: <4D0A9B1F.6030201@nosc.ja.net> > I think you are correct. 'Published' is also much easier to verify > for the IPRA's than 'clear'. Unfortunately the webcasts are not > available online yet, but IIRC there was agreement to use > 'published'. Does anybody remember differently? We were in danger of wordsmithing with a few hundred people in the room, but it tended towards "published" at the end. http://ripe61.ripe.net/archives/steno/2/ A search for "Blessing" takes you towards the conclusion of the discussion... :) Rob From emadaio at ripe.net Fri Dec 17 17:10:31 2010 From: emadaio at ripe.net (Emilio Madaio) Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 17:10:31 +0100 Subject: [address-policy-wg] Proposal reference 2010-05 WAS:2010-10 New Policy Proposal (Global Policy for IPv4 Allocation by the IANA post exhaustion) In-Reply-To: <20101215151418.354B66A00E@postboy.ripe.net> References: <20101215151418.354B66A00E@postboy.ripe.net> Message-ID: <4D0B8B77.4030502@ripe.net> Dear Colleagues, The email below was sent with an incorrect subject line. The correct subject line should have been: 2010-05 New Policy Proposal (Global Policy for IPv4 Allocation by the IANA post exhaustion) We apologise for any inconvenience caused by this. You can find the full proposal at: http://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2010-05.html We encourage you to review this proposal and send your comments to before 12 January 2011. Regards Emilio Madaio Policy Development Officer RIPE NCC On 12/15/10 4:14 PM, Emilio Madaio wrote: > Dear Colleagues, > > A new version for the Global Policy Proposal has been presented at the > RIPE 61 meeting in Rome. The new text has been produced and is now > available for discussion. > > You can find the full proposal at: > > http://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2010-05.html > > We encourage you to review this proposal and send your comments to > before 12 January 2011. > > Regards > > Emilio Madaio > Policy Development Officer > RIPE NCC >