[address-policy-wg] 2010-05 New Policy Proposal (Global Policy for IPv4 Allocation by the IANA post exhaustion)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2010-05 New Policy Proposal (Global Policy for IPv4 Allocation by the IANA post exhaustion)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2010-05 New Policy Proposal (Global Policy for IPv4 Allocation by the IANA post exhaustion)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Leo Vegoda
leo.vegoda at icann.org
Mon Aug 30 23:57:51 CEST 2010
On 30 Aug 2010, at 2:42, Chris Grundemann wrote: [...] >> Yes, the RIRs agreed a split for the old "Various Registries" space between themselves. They wrote to us about it in 2008 and a copy of the message and the breakdown is published on the ICANN web site: >> >> http://www.icann.org/correspondence/wilson-to-conrad-28jan08-en.pdf > > Thank you Leo! That was the missing link. > > I take this to mean that the authors original assumption is correct > and that as things sit today, IANA will have no IPv4 addresses > remaining immediately following IPv4 exhaustion. The Reclamation Pool > will therefor only contain addresses returned to the IANA. Yes, as things stand now, that's right. Regards, Leo
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2010-05 New Policy Proposal (Global Policy for IPv4 Allocation by the IANA post exhaustion)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2010-05 New Policy Proposal (Global Policy for IPv4 Allocation by the IANA post exhaustion)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]